ANT Lawyers
Vietnam Law Firm with English Speaking Lawyers
ANT Lawyers
Vietnam Law Firm with English Speaking Lawyers
ANT Lawyers
Vietnam Law Firm with English Speaking Lawyers
ANT Lawyers
Vietnam Law Firm with English Speaking Lawyers
ANT Lawyers
Vietnam Law Firm with English Speaking Lawyers
Thứ Ba, 28 tháng 4, 2020
What are the main rules of thumb about fair use on the web?
Thứ Hai, 27 tháng 4, 2020
NOIP Starts to Accept Direct Filing at Office Post Covid-19’s Hold Off
Chủ Nhật, 26 tháng 4, 2020
What do you need to register a trademark?
Thứ Năm, 23 tháng 4, 2020
How can I check if a quote is trademarked or copyrighted?
Thứ Tư, 22 tháng 4, 2020
How are intellectual property rights (IPR) infringed?
Regarding intellectual property law, is copyright infringement
theft?
A person’s or company’s \intellectual property rights are
infringed when someone else uses their intellectual property in ways that only
the intellectual property owner has the right to do.
Here is how the four types of intellectual property can be
infringed:
-Copyright is infringed when someone copies, records, publishes, distributes, publicly displays or performs, or makes derivative works of someone else’s creative work without permission.
-Trademark rights are infringed when someone uses a competitor’s trademark (or a confusingly similar one) to brand their own product or service.
-Patent rights are infringed when someone makes, uses, or sells, without permission, an invention for which someone else hold’s the patent.
-Trade secrets are infringed when someone publicly reveals a
company’s confidential information.
Depending on each jurisdiction’s laws, there may be certain factors considered or exceptions made when determining whether or not intellectual property rights have actually been infringed.
Source: David Mullich
If you're looking for an affordable IP attorneys in Vietnam, check out ANTLawyers.vn was established to meet these needs by providing fast, effective and economical solutions. Hope that clears things up a bit. Feel free to message me directly to chat further about any other IP questions that you faceThứ Ba, 21 tháng 4, 2020
Complaints and Settlement of Complaints on Registration of Industrial Property
According to the regulations of law on complaint, complain
means a citizen, agency, organization, cadre or civil servant requests a
competent agency, organization or person to review an administrative decision
or act of a state administrative agency or competent person in such agency when
having grounds to believe that such decision or act is unlawful and infringes
upon their rights and lawful interests. Whereby, the decision or notification
of National office of Intellectual property in Vietnam related to an industrial
property subject is also an administrative decision and may be complained if
the rights and benefit of interested parties to that industrial property
subject are effected.
Who have right to file complaint in intellectual propety
registration?
According to current
regulation of law on intellectual property regarding the complaint of industrial registration,
the subjects who have the right to complain to intellectual property authority
or file petition at the court include all organizations and individuals having
the rights and benefit directly relate to the decision or notification of
application on industrial property application.
How long is the timeline to file complaint in intellectual
property registration?
The first complaint is
conducted within ninety (90) days from the date when the persons who receive or
know about the notification on proceeding the industrial property application.
The second complaint is within thirties (30) days from the date of expired the
duration for settlement of the first complaint.
What is complaint filing procedures in intellectual property
registration?
Upon the expiry of the
time limit for settling the first complaints and the complaint was not settled
or the parties did not agree to the decision on settling the state authority,
then complainant, the person who has the directly related right and benefits
shall have the right to complain to Minister of Ministry of Science and
Technology – MOIST (the second complaint) or file petition at the court. If the
parties does not agree to the settlement decision of MOIST, then, the person
whom file complaint and the persons who has directly related right and benefit to
that decision may bring to case to the court.
What are the dossiers for filing complaint in intellectual
property registration?
The dossiers for filing complaint include the following documents:
The application with matters to be complained;
The submission and evidence of complaint;
The copy of decision or notification is subject to be complained;
The copy of settlement decision for the first complaint (to the second complaint);
Power of attorney (if submit the application via intellectual property agent i.e. ANT Lawyers).
What are settlement of complaint application?
Within ten (10) days
from the date of receiving the complaint application, the person who has the
competent of settling the complaint must examine the formal of application and
issue the notification to the complainant whether the complaint application is
being processed. In case of being processed, the person who has the competent
of settling the complaint shall notify in written document to the parties who
have directly related rights and benefits (“interested parties”) and set a time
limit for them to provide opinions. Interested parties have the right to
provide information, evidence for the opinion and the competent person is responsible
for considering such submissions. At the end of the time limit, if there is no
opinion from interested parties, the complaint shall be settled base on the
opinions of the complainant.
What are decision of settling the complaint and publication of such?
Based on the arguments
and evidence of complainant and interested parties, the competent person must
issue the decision of settling the complaint within the duration as regulated
of law on complaint. Before issue this decision, competent person notifies to
the complainant and interested parties on the arguments and evidences of each
party used to settle the complaint and the result of the complaint. The
decision of settling the complaint is published on Industrial Gazette within 02
months from the date of signing the decision.
If the client needs help
with handling such complaint, our intellectual property attorney in
Vietnam at ANT Lawyers will be of help.
ANT Lawyers - a Law firm in
Vietnam with international standard, local expertise and strong
international network. We focus on customers’ needs and provide clients with a
high quality legal advice and services. For advice or service request, please
contact us via email ant@antlawyers.vn, or call us +84 24 730 86 529.
Thứ Hai, 20 tháng 4, 2020
Investor State Dispute Settlement between Foreign Investor and Host State under CPTPP Agreement and EVIPA Agreement
New-generation FTAs not only limit the field of goods and
services but also expand regulation of scope of investment. The majority of
these FTAs include liberalization principles of investment and protection of
investor through regulation on dispute settlement mechanism between investor
and state (ISDS). The two agreements that have recently been paid attention to
are the Comprehensive and Progressive Agreementfor
Trans-Pacific Partnership (CPTPP) with Chapter 9 of Investment takingeffect
from January 14th, 2019 in Vietnam and EU – VietnamInvestment Protection
Agreement (EVIPA) (from EU-Vietnam Free Trade Agreement – EVFTA) whose
all member states are going to ratify before taking effect.
Firstly, in regard to
transparency rule of the dispute settlement, both
of CPTPP and EVIPA have provision improving the transparency of the
proceedings. Accordingly, all documents (submitted by parties, decision of
arbitral tribunal) except for protected information shall be made available to
the public. Hearings shall be conducted open to the public for relevant parties
to attend. EVIPA has applied the UNCITRAL Transparency Rules while CPTPP does
not apply this Rules but only some regulation specified in Article 9.24
(Article 9.24 of CPTPP and Article 3.46 of EVIPA).
Secondly, EVIPA has
established a permanent tribunal being different with the ad-hoc tribunal in
CPTPP. In EVIPA, investment tribunal system includes two tribunals: Tribunal
and Appeal Tribunal. This is the first time there is permanent tribunal in a
Investment Protection Agreement of Vietnam.
Thirdly, award of
tribunal. In EVIPA, final award shall be obeyed by the parties without appeal,
review, set aside, annulment or any other remedy. Vietnam is extended for a
period of 5 years following the date of entry into force of this Agreement, or
a longer period determined by the Committee. In that time, if Vietnam is the
respondent, recognition and enforcement of a final award shall be conducted
pursuant to the New York Convention of 1958 (Article 3.57). When 5-year period
is expired, recognition and enforcement shall be conducted pursuant to ICSID
Convention (without domestic procedures of recognition and enforcement).
Diplomatic protection shall not be applied unless one party has failed to abide
by and comply with the award (Article 3.58). Meanwhile, according to Article
9.29, CPTPP still allow revision or annulment of award. CPTPP has more
enforcement mechanism than EVIPA, including ICSID Convention (without domestic
procedures of recognition and enforcement), the New York Convention or the
Inter-American Convention (with domestic procedures of recognition and enforcement).
Finally, both EVIPA and
CPTPP improve the independence, impartiality and quality of arbitrators or
members of the tribunal while issuing a code of conduct them. In EVIPA, this
code of conduct is specified in Annex 11, while in CPTPP, this code is not
specified but shall be provided later by contracting parties on the basis of
Code of Conduct for Dispute Settlement Proceedings under Chapter 28 (Dispute
Settlement) (Paragraph 6, Article 9.22 of CPTPP).
At ANT
Lawyers - Law firm in Vietnam, our trial lawyers with
accreditation in national and international arbitration practice could help
providing legal advice in disputed matters, and guide the clients through out
the process. The lawyers could also advise the clients on various matters
from choice of arbitrator, choice of arbitration rules, ad-hoc or institutional
arbitration, place of arbitration, enforcement of arbitral award.
Thứ Sáu, 17 tháng 4, 2020
How to Temporary Suspension Customs Clearance Procedures for Goods Subject to Intellectual Property Rights Protection?
The import and export of counterfeit goods or goods that violate intellectual
property rights have been causing huge loss to the intellectual property rights
owner. The government’s process to control such will help utilize the
resources in the society and encourage the innovative companies to invest in
products in quality, designs, build trademarks… and ensure their intellectual
property rights are protected and they could benefit from such. When the owner
of property rights scans the market and find the violation of intellectual
property rights, they could appoint intellectual property attorney to work with
authorities and have proper legal solutions, including requesting the customs
authority to suspend the customs clearance.
Customs dispute law firm in Vietnam
As part of the international integration process into world trade, Vietnam has gradually issued legal instruments to strengthen tools for managing the potential violations especially in intellectual property areas.
On March 6, 2020, the
Ministry of Finance issued Circular no. 13/2020/TT-BTC on amending and
supplementing a number of articles of Circular no. 13/2015/TT-BTC dated January
30, 2015 providing for inspect, supervise and temporarily suspend customs
procedures for exports and imports subject to intellectual property
protection; controlling counterfeit goods and goods infringing
intellectual property rights.
Under point b, clause 1,
Article 1 of Circular no. 13/2020/NTT-BTC, customs control of counterfeit goods
and goods infringing intellectual property rights means the application of
professional customs control measures or/and other professional measures
implemented by customs authority according to the provisions of law to prevent
and combat smuggling and illegal transportation of goods being counterfeit
goods and goods infringing intellectual property rights in the geographical
areas of customs operation. Compared with the provisions of Circular no.
13/2015/TT-BTC, the scope of customs control for counterfeit goods and goods
infringing intellectual property rights is expanded, not only borders,
non-tariff areas.
The Ministry of Finance
supplements cases of refusal to receive applications for inspection and
supervision of export and import goods that require protection of intellectual
property rights of organizations or individuals, specifically: may refuse to
accept applications if additional submissions are within 10 working days from
the date of the notice of additional submission.
Besides, amending and
supplementing regulations on handling of goods showing signs of intellectual
property rights infringement. Within 03 working days after receiving the notice
of goods showing signs of infringement of intellectual property rights of the
customs office, if the intellectual property right holder or the lawfully
authorized person does not have the request for suspension of customs
procedures is completed, the customs authority will continue to carry out the
customs procedures. In case the intellectual property right owner or the
lawfully authorized person does not have a written request for temporary suspension
of customs procedures but pays a sum of money or guarantee documents as
prescribed or have a written request for temporary suspension of customs
procedures but do not pay a sum of money or guarantee documents as prescribed,
the Sub-department of Customs where customs procedures are carried out does not
suspend customs procedures for goods, unless it is detected counterfeit goods
on intellectual property. In contrast, if the intellectual property rights
owner of goods requests the suspension of customs procedures, the
Sub-department of Customs where the customs procedures are carried out shall
issue a decision on suspension of customs procedures. In cases where there are
sufficient grounds to identify goods infringing upon intellectual property
rights, the Director of the Customs Sub-Department shall consider deciding to
immediately apply handling measures prescribed in Articles 214 and 215 of the
Law on Intellectual Property 2005, at the same time, coordinate with control
forces at all levels to collect information, investigate and verify goods to
handle according to regulations. The time limit for suspension of customs
procedures is 10 working days from the date the customs authority issues a
decision to suspend customs procedures. In addition, different from the
previous regulations, the person who requests for temporary suspension of
customs procedures may extend the time limit (if there is a plausible reason)
if paying additional money or guarantee documents, the extended time limit; the
extended period shall not exceed 10 working days from the expiry of the
suspension period as prescribed in clause 8, Article 1 of Circular no.
05/2020/TT-BTC.
Regulations on
suspension of customs procedures for detecting signs of infringement of
intellectual property rights are provisions to protect goods that have
been registered for intellectual property rights. Intellectual property
is the most valuable type of intangible asset to every enterprise. When an
enterprise has trademarks, inventions, industrial designs… applied to products
that are registered for intellectual property rights, these intellectual
property objects will become the property of the enterprise, and giving the
company a lot of advantages on monopoly rights and protection policies and such
should be protected properly with the help of intellectual property lawyers.
This Circular is
effective from April 20, 2020. Organizations and individuals exporting or
importing goods; Organizations and individuals that are owners of intellectual
property rights, owners of genuine goods which are counterfeited or lawful
representatives of owners need to follow and comply with the provisions of law
to know and protect their rights.
ANT Lawyers - A Law firm in Vietnam is supported by a team of experienced patent,
trademark, design attorneys with qualification and skills handling full range
of legal services relating to intellectual property rights in
Vietnam. We have specialized in the preparation and registration of
patents, trademarks and designs for our clients.
Thứ Năm, 16 tháng 4, 2020
Vietnam Initiates the Investigation on Anti-dumping to Polyester Filament Yarns
On April 6 2020, Minister of Ministry of Trade and Industry
(MOIT) signed the Decision 1079/QD-BCT on investigating and applying anti-dumping measures to
some products made of polyester filament yarns originated from People’s Republic of China, Republic of India,
Republic of Indonesia and Malaysia. Related parties may by themselves or
authorize to experienced law firm in Vietnam on international trade to work
with Trade Remedies Authority of Vietnam to cooperate.
Who are Requesters of Anti-dumping Investigation in Vietnam?
The Requester is 03
(three) companies including (i) Vietnam Petrochemical and Fiber Joint Stock
Company (ii) Formosa Industries Corporation (iii) century synthetic fiber
corporation. In which, production of Requester and Supporter take 67,4% total
similar production produced domestically and there is no domestic producer
oppose the case.
What Imported Products under Anti-dumping Investigation in
Vietnam?
The products under
investigation of AD10 are some products made of polyester filament yarns with
following HS code: 5402.33.00, 5402.46.00 and 5402.47.00 originated from
People’s Republic of China (China), Republic of India (India), Republic of
Indonesia (Indonesia) and Malaysia.
What are Duty Levels Proposed by Requester?
Countries/territories of origin |
Proposed duty |
China |
17,0% |
India |
54,9% |
Indonesia |
60,6% |
Malaysia |
6,4% |
How to Determine Damage and Causal relationship in Anti-dumping
Case?
Products which are supposed to be dumped are the reasons leading to the significant damage of domestic industry:
-An excessive increase regarding the imported production of products originated from China, India, Indonesia and Malaysia.
-Signs of the price difference, the price of imported products are always considerably lower than the sale price of domestic industry.
-Decrease in profits and gross profit margin, production, coefficient of using capacity of domestic industry, whilst the market share of similar products from China, India, Indonesia and Malaysia is increasing.
The causal relationship:
The dossiers of Requester proved that there is a causal relationship between
dumping imported products and significant damage of domestic industry.
How to Register as Interested Parties in Anti-dumping Case?
According to Article 74
Law on foreign trade management, interested parties in the case include:
a) Overseas organizations and individuals that
produce and export products under consideration to Vietnam;
b) Importers of products under consideration;
c) Foreign associations whose majority of
members are organizations and individuals producing and exporting products under
consideration;
d) The Government and competent authorities of
the exporting country of product under consideration;
dd) Organizations and individuals that submit
the application for the trade remedies;
e) Domestic producers of like products;
g) Domestic associations whose majority of
members are producers of like products;
h) Other organizations and individuals that
obtain legal rights and interests related to the investigated cases or
facilitate the investigation or representative organizations of protection of
customer rights.
Accordingly,
organizations and individuals must register and be accepted by Investigating
Authority to become Interested Parties in case.
Organizations and individuals can register with Investigating
Authority as Interested Parties in case according to Application form for
registration as interested parties and send them to Investigating Authority at
the below address by the following methods: (i) Official dispatch and (ii)
email within 60 working days from the day on which the decision on
investigation takes effect (April 06th, 2020).
In order to ensure their
rights and interests, the investigating authority recommend that organizations
and individuals that produce, import or use the investigated goods register as
interested parties to exercise the right to access information, provide
information and express opinions during the investigation of the case.
What Investigation Questionnaire Refers To?
Within 15 days after the
issuance of the investigation decision of the Minister of Industry and Trade,
the Investigating Authority shall send the investigation questionnaire to the
Interested Parties, including:
i).The applicant requests for application of
anti-dumping measures;
ii).Other domestic manufacturers which
Investigating Authority knows;
iii).Parties requesting for application
investigation of anti-dumping measures which Investigating Authority knows;
iv).Importers of goods under investigation;
v).Diplomatic authorities of the country where
the origin of goods under investigation;
vi).Other interested parties deemed necessary by
the Investigating Authority.
Within 30 days after
receiving the investigation question, Interested Parties must provide a written
answer to all questions in the questionnaire. In case of necessity or a written
request for extension with reasonable reasons from Interested Parties, the
Investigating Authority may extend the time limit but it must be not more than
30 days.
Please be informed that
the time limit for the anti-dumping measures imposition
investigation shall be within 12 months from the day on which the decision on
investigation is issued. In special case, Investigating Authority can determine
other time limit for investigation but it shall not be less than 6 months.
Our competition lawyers at ANT Lawyers - law
firm in Vietnam will always follow up with development from
authorities to provide update to clients on anti-dumping cases
Thứ Ba, 14 tháng 4, 2020
What Procedures an Enterprise Complies on Publishing Business Information?
What Are Advantages Resolving Disputes by Commercial Arbitration?