What is the most elegant patent application?

I associate the word "elegant" with solutions to problems that are well-defined. With that point of view, the word does not even apply to a patent application. That is, "elegance" is not even a goal when preparing a patent application.

Patent Law Firm in Vietnam

Basically, writing a patent application is like creating software, within a budget (explicitly stated or implicit) that is going to be released into the wild for maybe 20 years, with no opportunity to fix it after it has been released.

Actually, writing a patent application is a little more difficult than that. It's more like creating the software and also writing a description of it. No matter what the software functionally can do, it is limited by its description, so you want to make the description as broad as possible. On the other hand, the description can be attacked if it says the software does more than it actually is capable of doing, so you don't want to make the description too broad.

One of the first tasks is to try to anticipate all the problems that might arise over the next 20 years or so, which is already very challenging. Then, of course, you have to try to address those problems as best you can.

Therefore, it is much more important to make a patent application as strong and robust as possible, given the limited resources available, than it is to make it elegant.

That said, as with pretty much any job, it is possible to come up with clever or even out-of-the-box solutions to certain sub-problems within the overall job. However, those solutions, while satisfying to the patent attorney, are almost always invisible to others.

I have had litigators who were enforcing patents I drafted and prosecuted, compliment me on the quality of the patent application, but it is rare that anyone else would have sufficient expertise and also an opportunity to examine a patent application closely enough to notice how good, or bad, it is.

ANT Lawyers - A Law firm in Vietnam is supported by a team of experienced patent, trademark, design attorneys with qualification and skills handling full range of legal services relating to intellectual property rights in Vietnam.  We have specialized in the preparation and registration of patents, trademarks and designs for our clients.

Source: Quora

Read More

When should a startup file for a patent?

Each jurisdiction is different in terms of its “first to disclose”, “first to file” and “first to invent” rules. First to file and first to invent - Wikipedia

You should file a provisional patent application as soon as possible (to establish your patent’s priority date) if you are filing your patent application in the US because USPTO follows a “first inventor to file” rule. First Inventor to File (FITF) Resources

Vietnam Patent 

I’ll recommend the following course of action to help you file a provisional patent application as quickly as possible:

a) Conduct a through prior art search as soon as possible to make sure that your idea is novel, non-obvious to others in your field, and has utility in real life.

b) Draft your first independent claim. Draft any additional independent claims if you’ve more than one. Don’t waste your time on drafting any dependent claims at this stage.

c) Focus on writing as many possible embodiments you can think of for implementing not only your independent claim(s) that you have drafted but also for all possible dependent claims (that you’ve not drafted). Refer to 2164-The Enablement Requirement to guide you in writing your embodiments.

d) While drafting your embodiments, draw as many diagrams as possible to show your invention and its implementation. Follow Patent Drawing Rules: Everything You Need to Know. No need to use any fancy tools for doing your diagrams. Make your drawings by hand for now to save some time.

e) Provide a brief definition of any special terms that you are using in your patent claims and embodiments.

f) Draft a paragraph to serve as abstract. No need to write any paragraphs covering background of the invention or summary of the invention. Providing a list of prior art is also not needed at this stage.

You are now ready to file a provisional patent application. File it without any delay to establish a priority date. You’ll have a full year to file your non-provisional patent after this date. During this one year time, also called a “pendency period”, patent process is pending till you file your non-provisional patent application.

Read More

Which is the best country to file patent rights?

With respect to your first filed patent application, you may not have a choice. Some countries have export control laws that require that you first file in your current country. Only after being granted a foreign filing license do you then have the option to file in other countries.

PCT National Phase Entry in Vietnam

According to the Paris Convention, you have within one year of your first filed application to file in foreign countries and claim priority to the filing date of the first filed application. Filing in many countries can be extremely expensive, however. A common strategy is thus to file a single PCT application, which can later be the basis for national/regional stage filings. This delays the expense, and allows more time to decide which countries are best. But one must realized that this strategy only applies to PCT member states. That does not include some countries, for example, Taiwan and Argentina. Applications must be filed there within a year of the first filing.

30 months after the earliest priority date of the PCT application, you’ll need to decide which countries (or regions) to enter the PCT application into. The best choice may be none. For example, if the PCT search report reveals prior art that is fatal to the patent application.

Assuming there are no major show-stoppers in the PCT stage, then there is a complex analysis that needs to take into account various factors, such as 1) your patent budget, 2) the market size in each country, 3) the likelihood of manufacturing in each country, 4) the strength of patent laws in each country, 5) the kinds of technologies patentable in each country. Balancing these against each other and coming up with an set of countries is extremely case specific. There is no generic answer as to what country or countries is best in the abstract. That being said, some of the most common countries/regions are US, Europe, Japan, Canada, Australia, S. Korea, and China. Within Europe, patents are most often validated in UK, France, and Germany

Read More