The traditional economic
argument for patenting is that since innovation is a highly risky endeavor and
the benefits to society are often greater than the benefits to the innovator,
if filled with rational actors, society would otherwise underinvest in innovation.
In addition, if the innovator keeps her invention secret then it is difficult
for others to benefit from this information and make further innovations. So
the solution offered by patent policy is to give the innovator monopoly profits
for a period of time in exchange for putting the information behind the patent
into the pubic domain. There are other methods for encouraging
innovation, including R&D tax credits, subsidies, government procurement,
or prizes for innovation.
Arora and coauthors
(2008) find that patents stimulate R&D across a wide range of manufacturing
industries. Moser (2005) finds that countries without patent protection tend to concentrate their innovation in
industries where trade secrets are most effective, so patenting spreads out the
distribution of innovative activity. However, she also concludes that for
developing countries creating a patent system may not be an optimal solution
initially.
Generally speaking, IP
law favors creators. In most developed nations, it is possible for private
litigants to prevail in court when substantive claims are made. There is a long
history of cases decided for the "little guy".
Corporate entities may
try to stall such proceedings or to overwhelm claimants, but well documented IP
rights are often upheld or settled for the benefit of the creator.
Without such laws, we
would be awash in a sea of piracy. We would be left only with trade secrets as
our sole protection which would make production costs skyrocket, or keep
artists and trade entities relatively unknown and mired in litigation.
This is not to say that
all use of IP law is fair to creators and consumers.
Knowledgeable artists will be among the first to point to "public
domain" as a key and critical part of IP law which is being usurped by
corporations in the USA and possibly globally. Public domain is built on a
premise that at some point, creations become a part of the cultural fabric.
The Micky Mouse
character known as "Steamboat Willie" is often cited as central to
this debate. As the film short was about to enter public domain American
copyright protections were extended to protect this Walt Disney property. However
a viable argument can and is often made that Disney can protect its interests
through Trademark law, while allowing the world access to the original production
as a part of global culture through public domain.
If you are looking for
an experienced IP
services in Vietnam to help you with your IP application, you should visit
ANTLawyers.vn. Our attorneys have experience with the IP process and will work
closely with you as you apply for your IP.
0 nhận xét:
Đăng nhận xét